Interpretation

Purpose

To show how airborne FDEM data are processed and inverted to reveal meaningful information about the earth structure.

Interpretation is the process that extracts information in the delivered data to make decisions or to derive geologic knowledge. Depending on the specific geologic questions asked, and the resources available, geophysicists can choose from a wide spectrum of approaches ranging from trivial and low-resolution to sophisticated and high-resolution.

Preliminary interpretation

Data plotting

Significant amount of information, especially the relative distribution of conductivity, can be obtained by just plotting the data. Sometimes simple data transform techniques can also be used to isolate the anomaly and aid the interpretation. This type of approach can include: direct data plotting, data- conductivity transform, empirical template method, etc. Those simple methods were once the mainstream, but have shown drawbacks in complex geological setting and lack the ability to decode the conductivity values from the data. However, it still has its value in data quality control and preliminary interpretation.

We use a simple sphere in a halfspace model similar to the sphere in a resistive halfspace example, but this time using a larger halfspace conductivity (\(10^{-2}\) S/m). Notice that the response away from the sphere varies greatly between frequencies due to the response from the ground.



Once Loop Reflect

Apparent conductivity

Apparent conductivity is another semi-qualitative method that further ties the data to the conductivity of the ground. It is defined as the conductivity of a uniform half-space that would generate the same data at a particular time or frequency. It can be considered as a lumping averaging of the conductivities around the measurement location. Despite its blending effect, it provides qualitative insight about how the conductivity varies from shallow (high frequency) to deep (low frequency). In combination with a depth estimation using skin depth, apparent conductivity forms the basis of a host of imaging methods, referred to as conductivity-depth transform (CDT) or imaging (CDI).

Quantitative Inversion

1D layered earth inversion

../../../_images/fdem_inv1d_demo.png

Fig. 188 1D layered earth inversion of the 3-layer model.

This approach assume the earth’s conductivity only varies as a function of depth. At each measurement location, the inversion find a layered model that explains the data at all the observing frequencies. Fig. 188 shows the 1D inversion result of the 3-layer example in Physics. The conductive layer from 20 to 40 m depth is reasonably recovered by the inversion, although the interfaces are not sharp becasue of the smooth constraint used in the inversion.

../../../_images/FEM_1D_Columns.png

Fig. 189 1D layered earth inversions of the sphere model.

For the data from the sphere model, 1D inversion can still be performed at individual stations to provide information about local changes in conductivity. Fig. 189 presents such 1-D models in a 3-D space for the sphere example, but the lack of lateral continuity makes it difficult to interpret. Many layered models at multiple locations then can be stitched together to form a pseudo-3D volume for model visualization. Advanced techniques can also consider the correlation between adjacent locations by imposing lateral constraints.

Here we use the synthetic data set generated for the sphere model as an example to demonstrate the 1D inversion technique. The earth is horizontally divided into 20 layers from the surface to the basement. The top layer is 0.5 m thick, and the layers are gradually thickened at a rate of 1.2 toward the depth. The data are noise-free, but we assume that there is a 20 ppm noise floor in both in-phase and quadrature. The animation below compares the observed (top) and predicted (bottom) data and the pseudo-3D conductivity model obtained by stitching the individual 1D layered models. The sphere is reasonably imaged on the cross section. Although the sphere’s geometry is distorted and its conductivity value is underestimated, the inversion still reasonably reflects the correct horizontal location and the depth to the sphere’s top.



Once Loop Reflect